Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Besides, I said marrying child with conditions on no sex...are you or you can't read...marriage is contact where you can freely stipulate conditions before marriage child or adult makes no difference...which retard takes marriage as sex slavery? Islamic marriage is not your lame western church marriage, were sex is necessity in marriage. Contract can stipulate any time frame, for having sex.
Anyways you are too green to understand the intricacies of marriage contracts.
Answer me this, and you can choose only one.
Which is more reprehensible to you?
1. Murder.
2. Child marriage.
  Considerate: 23%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: stipulate conditions    time frame   illogical rants   marriage child  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
***I will ignore your illogical rants which makes no sense
I know as in your world view a 53 year old peadophile having sex with an 8 year old is totally “logical”
****and you are running in circles with misunderstood terminologies,
Incorrect , a 53 year old having sex with an 8 year old is a peadophile .....Muhammad was a peadophile.....Sorry basic terminology as used in civilisation upsets your Bronze Age belief system
****Besides, I said marrying child with conditions on no sex.
Yet Muhammad consummated his “marriage “ when Aisha was 8 , pity you didn’t tell him about the “conditions”
***are you or you can't read.
The only one displaying idiocy is you and you’re only partly literate which I guess is an improvement on the peado Muhammad who being the dummy he was couldn’t read or write
..****marriage is contact where you can freely stipulate conditions before marriage child or adult makes no difference...which retard takes marriage as sex slavery?
****Anyways you are too green to understand the intricacies of marriage contracts.
Youre right , I don’t get how a Muslim man can give his 6 year to a peadophile, those pesky “intricacies “
****Answer me this, and you can choose only one.
****Which is more reprehensible to you?
You don’t to get to tell me how many choices I have
*****1. Murder.
2. Child marriage.
You have to give specific examples as my morality is subjective as you keep pointing out. You cannot prove morality is objective so again you’re just shooting your fool mouth off
  Considerate: 18%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: old peadophile    year old   marriage child   intricacies of marriage contracts.Youre right  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I do I am asking to analyse your degree of reprehension. And see you are stuck between a rock and a hard place. And this is why your morality standard is flawed. It is not practical in dealing with real life situations. And if its not doing that its useless.
I rest my case.
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: real life situations    hard place   morality standard   choices  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes because you’ve no defence as usual
****I do
You still don’t
****I am asking to analyse your degree of reprehension.
But you haven’t given one case as an example such is your stupidity
****And see you are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
I’m actually not , you cannot give an example why’s that?
****And this is why your morality standard is flawed.
My morality is not in question as it’s vastly superior to yours , the majority of Muslims and certainty the peadophile prophets
***It is not practical in dealing with real life situations
As in abusing kids like Muhammad you mean
.***And if its not doing that its useless.
So on that contention you agree Muhammad was a dog
***rest my case.
I don’t blame you your complete capitulation was anticipated and a foregone conclusion
  Considerate: 18%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: morality standard    hard place   real life situationsAs   majority of Muslims  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are merely ranting....its a simple question with one choice of two, no example needed and you are struggling so much just from it.
This conversation end.
See you around.
Bye.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: simple question    it.This conversation end.See   choice   example  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** You are merely ranting.
Says Osama
..***its a simple question with one choice of two,
Its a typically question
***no example needed
well yes there is only an like you would think otherwise
****and you are struggling so much just from it
No my struggle is actually with a Muslim fanatic who admitted that he’s “familiar “ with children who lust after old men , typical follower of mad Muhammad I guess
***This conversation end.
Yes your let that beating be a lesson to you , know your place Osama
***See you around.
Bye.
GTFO
  Considerate: 13%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: simple question    typical follower of mad Muhammad   ranting.Says Osama   Muslim fanatic  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
LoL, poor kid.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: poor kid    LoL      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
***LO L, poor kid
The type you and the peado prophet have a “fondness “ for .....LOL
  Considerate: 28%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 71%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: LO L    poor kidThe type   peado prophet   fondness  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
No. Poor as in on one's beam ends. I am not interested in you.
Do let me know if you want to marry though, you seem eager.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: peado prophet    type   fondness   beam ends  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
***No. Poor as in on one's beam ends
Beam ends??? Yet your contention was Mo married Aisha because her family were poor yet when I educated you that they were in fact rich you didn’t deny the obvious Mo like you like them very young
.****I am not interested in you.
Which is why you said “bye “ but are now stalking me .....Like prophet like follower
****Do let me know if you want to marry though, you seem eager.
I’m married , don’t fret I know you get plenty of kiddie action you did say 8 year olds sit on your knee didn’t you?
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: obvious Mo    plenty of kiddie action   year olds   contention  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
No I just find you very funny, because you seem more butt hurt about the marriage of prophet you don't even follow, problematic even more so than the non-believer who were alive at the time of the prophet himself and after him for 1300 years. If anyone has right to criticise over his marriage it were the Arabs of his time, which they never did, not even critics of Quran do that, because they understand they can't project moral standards through eras. I mean you can't define a person with a terminology which didn't even exist in his time. Only mentally unstable person would do that.
Its like deep down you want to marry someone young but couldn't due to cultural restraints and projecting your hate and regret on someone else who did. Obviously I am not pointing out its a psychological issue, but it sure is not normal when you already know from history that child marriage was nothing abnormal, and that it was moral for that time for their cultural customs. But instead of accepting that fact you term it as All Arabs were paedophile and still persist which your "composition fallacy" which means you are prejudiced, anti-semitic and racist, because child marriage was prevalent throughout the world. Now you might go the route of "whataboutism" but that will be a definist fallacy by projecting the term paedophilia just for Islamic prophet and for the other's as a normal cultural practice. Which is downright making a patsy of Islamic prophet. in a simple word LAME.
And imagine if you found out you were a progeny from a similar ancient marriage, or worse rape, can you psychologically handle it, knowing your very being came in existence through such a marriage or such a immoral sexual act? You really need to check your emotions... they are all over the place.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
I just find you very funny and immature, because you seem to be more butt hurt about the marriage of a person you don't even follow and by using a terminology that didn't exist till early/late 1900 century due to the misbehaviour's of your own culture. If anyone who should object it, it should be the non-believers of ancient Arabs from his time and after, but they didn't because it was morally right to bury daughter before and it was morally right to marry young girls before and after prophet. Your contention to term all ancient Arab as paedophilic which you previously agree is merely a "composition fallacy", because child marriage was and is prevalent throughout the world and these people are not Muslims or Arabs, that is you being anti-semantic and racist. You might take a route of "whataboutism" but that will only be a "red herring" fallacy on your part. I mean even learned critics of Quran and Islam don't project the moral standards of one culture to another Era past 100 years and you are doing it for a 1440 year old marriage, that is past millennium. And imagine if you found of your very existence is through a progeny of child sex, or rape or slave sex, do you think you can mentally handle it? its looks like you wanted yourself to marry someone young but stopped yourself from doing so from cultural influence and you are in pain and regret and projecting it on Islamic prophet by making him into a scapegoat. Not saying this is the case, but your emotions are all over the place, which is not a way to proceed with a logical debate. And every time you project the moral standards of today to 1400 years that is merely "definist fallacy" and hence irrelevant.
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 48%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
****I just find you very funny and immature, because you seem to be more butt hurt about the marriage of a person you don't even follow
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes. a crime is not a crime until it is proven as crime. And child marriage was never a crime not 4000 years ago, not 1400 yrs ago if you see legally. You are again appealing to emotion by using words like "abused"
Yes you did, in your previous post you said somehow "it was my contention that ancient arab was pedophilic and that you agree...and it now also is"
But my contention is not about paedophilia at all, my contention is Ancient arab already had child marriages and so did other parts of world 1400 years ago. So what happened to other people of the world being paedophilic....This is the "composition fallacy". You are leaving one demographic and only accusing another demographic for your claims.
In case you don't know all Arabs are Semites and so am I from my genealogy. Because they are from family of Ishmael son of Abraham.
I am not defending paedophilia and I am also not defending child marriage of this day and age, I am correcting your appeal to emotion that you are projecting on 1400 yr old marriage of a dead husband and wife, who I might add loved each other. Let me tell you Aisha's own words:
narrated Aisha "I saw no one cooking food like safiyyah, she once cooked food for the messenger of Allah and sent it. I got angry [jealous] and broke the vessel. I then asked: O messenger of Allah, what can I do to make up for what I have done? He said A meal for a meal "replace it."
This shows her jealousy and you only get jealous of other wives when you love the husband...not because you are taking revenge on husband to make him go hungry.
Again here you are making an Ad hominem fallacy and appeal to emotion fallacy to make your point as valid, when it is not, because its not immoral to marry child in 700AD.
Again you are going with Ad hominem, appeal to emotion, and circular reasoning [a paedophile is paedophile like really?]
And no I don't find that there are creatures of other elements to be hilarious, it is even scientifically possible. So on what basis does it becomes hilarious? and there are only two kinds in unseen - Angels and Jinns...there are tons of videos on possessions in real life happenings I can even direct you to go watch yourself [since seeing is believing] And we are already made aware that these are creature of fire [jinn kind] beforehand. Science cannot find solutions to problems related to their so called "supernatural" entities....but for us there are merely jinn kind which are not that harmful.
I don't acknowledge him as paedophile on following reasons:
1. He had 11 other adult wives 2. Aisha was not his last wife, he married more after her
3. The ones he married after were all adults not kids. 4. He waited for 3 years before consummation.
5. He had children from only two women. 6. His daughter was married at age 9.
7. It was marriage accepted by both of her parents, 8. The wife never complained about being abused sexually.
9. Th wife expressed her love for him, in man places in her narrations. 10. He didn't go around picking up young girls for marriage after one.
11. The marriage was socially accepted
12. There was not law to make it immoral
13. Mortality rate was high due to hygiene and poverty some people used to die as infants or by adolescent, hence whether she was from rich or poor doesn't matter they were married earlier.
14. Your claiming child marriage as paedophilia does't make it paedophilia...it will still be child marriage...because it already happened and you were non existent at that time. o your opinion mean nothing.
Paedophilia has its distinct meaning and implications, and none of the above 14 points shows that this was a case of paedophilia.
Based on all the above reasons, your statements are.
Ad hominem, False Dichotomy, Appeal to emotion, definist and composition fallacy, and also circular reasoning.
Basically your entire responses were full of fallacy and irrelevant, to the topic of this thread and morality itself.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
****Yes. a crime is not a crime until it is proven as crime.
So abuse is not abuse until proven and murder is not murder till proven, you are offensively
***** And child marriage was never a crime not 4000 years ago, not now. You are again appealing to emotion by using words like "abused"
Right so peadophillia was the norm in Arabic society yes I agree and that's why it's still permitted as approved by the Quran
****Yes you did, in your previous post you said somehow "it was my contention that ancient arab was pedophilic and that you agree...and it now also is"
What are you on about?
****But my contention is not about paedophilia at all, my contention is Ancient arab already had child marriages and so did other parts of world 1400 years ago.
Yes agreed Islam encouraged sex with children who hadn't reached puberty
*** so what happened to other people of the world being paedophilic....This is the "composition fallacy". You are leaving one demographic and only accusing another demographic for your claims.
But tell me a country that has a sacred book that approves of child abuse ? You cannot thus your attempt at another red herring
****In case you don't know all Arabs are Semites and so am I from my genealogy. Because I am from family of Ishmael son of Abraham.
How utterly fascinating
*****I am not defending paedophilia and I am also not defending child marriage of this day and age,
You are , you continue to do so
**** I am correcting your appeal to emotion that you are projecting on 1400 yr old marriage of a dead husband and wife, who I might add loved each other. Let me tell you Aisha's own words:
Another attempt by you at deflection , child abuse is clearly approved of in the Quran
**^^*narrated Aisha "I saw no one cooking food like safiyyah, he once cooked food for the messenger of Allah and sent it. I got angry [jealous] and broke the vessel. I then asked: O messenger of Allah, what can I do to make up for what I have done? He said A meal for a meal "replace it."
**** Do I really need to educate you on the practice of thighing as approved of by Mo and the Quran
****This shows he jealousy and you only get jealous of other wives when you love the husband...not because she is taking revenge on husband to make him go hungry.
Again here you are making an Ad hominem fallacy and appeal to emotion fallacy to make your point as valid. when it is not, because its not immoral to marry child in 700D
Your continued defence of child abuse is getting desperate now
****Again you are going with Ad hominem,
I call you a peadophile as you admitted you know children who lit for you and now you're butt hurt
*** I appeal to emotion, and circular reasoning [a paedophile is paedophile like really?]
I know
****And no I don't find that there are creatures of other elements to be hilarious, it is even scientifically possible.
Prove it? You cannot
*^**So on what basis does it becomes hilarious? and there are only two kinds in unseen - Angels and Jinns...there are tons of videos on possessions in real life
There's not one verified by science
****happenings I can even direct you to go watch yourself [since seeing is believing] And we are already made aware that these are creature of fire [jinn kind] beforehand. Science cannot find solutions to problems related to their so called "supernatural" entities....
Because it's B S , prove otherwise ....What? .....Oh you cannot
****but for us there are merely jinn kind which are not that harmful.
Ha , ha jinn and yellow flying horses .....ooookay
******I don't acknowledge him as paedophile on following reasons:
1. He had 11 other adult wives 2. Aisha was not his last wife, he married more after her
3. The ones he married after were all adults not kids. 4. He waited for 3 years before consummation.
5. He had children from only two women. 6. His daughter was married at age 9.
7. It was marriage accepted by both of her parents, 8. The wife never complained about being abused sexually.
9. Th wife expressed her love for him, in man places in her narrations. 10. He didn't go around picking up young girls for marriage after one.
11. The marriage was socially accepted
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Again your entire post is fallacy....its like inception of fallacies...do you think I can't even know such stupidity.
I bet you do, But yet that's exactly what you claimed Didn't stop you before ... Ad hominem + fallacy fallacy
So abuse is not abuse until proven and murder is not murder till proven, you are offensively ,,, equivocation fallacy+ appeal to emotion fallacy+ definist fallacy+false equivalence fallacy+poisoning the well fallacy
Right so peadophillia was the norm in Arabic society yes I agree and that's why it's still permitted as approved by the Quran - Hasty generalisation fallacy+historian's fallacy
What are you on about? ...appeal to the stone fallacy
****But my contention is not about paedophilia at all, my contention is Ancient arab already had child marriages and so did other parts of world 1400 years ago.
Yes agreed Islam encouraged sex with children who hadn't reached puberty - magical thinking fallacy
*But tell me a country that has a sacred book that approves of child abuse ? You cannot thus your attempt at another red herring
- Loaded question fallacy
How utterly fascinating ....appeal to common sense fallacy
You are , you continue to do so...appeal to stone+ ad hominem+poinsoning the well fallacy
You are better than Donald Trump why don't you run for president, you have more than 70 logical fallacies in your post....I didn't even want to bother with the rest.
Basically your entire posts so far are poisoning the well fallacy, I don't think I need to justify anything anymore since it will be waste of knowlege on you..try to grow some brain cells before you come for a debate you incest+child abusing person.
I can ad hominen you too, since you support a grandfather doing sex abuse to his child granddaughter by using a hasty generalisation fallacy.
Do tell me which is moral, choose only one.
1. Murder
2, Child marriage
3. Grandfather sleeping with child granddaughter
You will be stuck again, since your morality compass false and can crumble anytime, you have no authority to judge other era's morality with your historian's fallacy.
Another thing grow up you are already married and you are debating to an unmarried youth in mid 20s. So even if I let little 8-9 yr old girls sit on my lap nothing wrong with it, they can marry in another 8-9 years if they want, I won't be too old.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Like a Muslim half - wit you list of a copy and pasted list of fallacies and yet you don't not even know what the term means
  Considerate: 24%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: term means    towel head   brain cells   list of a copy  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I can't be considered paedophile because I have sexual inclination towards girls with full breast size.... hence your accusation is false...I don't even like kids why would I even be interested in them?
I do know what those terms means and I have to read each and every of your sentence and look into each on of those to put it there.
I will be honest I don't know many, but your posts had too many...its like inception of fallacies.
  Considerate: 41%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: terms means    like inception of fallacies   accusation   sexual inclination  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
*** I can't be considered paedophile because I have sexual inclination towards girls with full breast size.
Yet you boasted about you girls lusting for you and sitting in your knee what’s the name for that?
Yet you admitted such
**** I don't even like kids why would I even be interested in them?
Well according to you they lust after you , remember?
***/I do know what those terms means and I have to read each and every of your sentence and look into each on of those to put it there.
I’m not responsible for your ignorance
***/I will be honest I don't know many, but your posts had too many...its like inception of fallacies.
My posts had none , you’re butt hurt because I’ve destroyed all your childish arguments
  Considerate: 26%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: like inception of fallacies.My posts    full breast size.Yet   sexual inclination   terms means  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 16%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Ad hominem    self assumption statements      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** irrelevant and self delusional and self assumption statements about me = Ad hominem
Incorrect , you admitted children lust after you , you’re just like your “boss”.....
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: self assumption statements    Ad hominemIncorrect   children   boss  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am young and handsome, so what if child lusts after me? What matters is I am not lusting after the child.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: child lusts    child      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** I am young and handsome, so what if child lusts after me?
Yet you said you like them sitting on your knee ..... Did you take “lessons” from the “prophet”?
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: child lusts    children   lessons   knee  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
Where is your prove that they come and sit on my lap...look the chats again...I bet you won't find it.
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: children    lap   chats   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
***/Where is your prove that they come and sit on my lap...look the chats again...I bet you won't find it.
Delete option is great for people like you , are you denying you stated you knew children that lusted after you and others?
Here is the problem for you , you’re admitting such disgusts you . so tell me why is it ok if the prophet does it?
Beaten again using your “reasoning” , you really need to work on your “logic”
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: it.Delete option    prove   lap   chats  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't want your rants I want prove. [I won't believe until I see it] So how are you able to believe that girls are lusting after me and other without seeing it? Yet you don't believe in God without seeing it.....the inconsistencies in your mentality is coming out bit by bit. First it was the lack of coherent morality standard then all logical fallacies just to prove your statements have substantial prove just because you type them, and now this believing without seeing.
So I need proves for everything, Why is your morality standard right? Why are your fallacies relevant? and why do you believe without seeing?
Produce your prove...if you are truthful.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lack of coherent morality standard    logical fallacies   rants   morality standard  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Are you drunk or on drugs because that post is meaningless gibberish , get an adult to assist you in penning something coherent that’s if you can find one amongst your fellow towel heads
  Considerate: 27%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: meaningless gibberish    drugs   fellow towel heads   post  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is coherent...you said you believe girls are lusting after me and others and said that I deleted the post....so since you believe without seeing, how is this same principle not applicable to God.
So prove it to me why do you believe my statements without seeing me? But not God's.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp    girls   principle   post  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** It is coherent...you said you believe girls are lusting after me and others and said that I deleted the post....so since you believe without seeing, how is this same principle not applicable to God.
So prove it to me why do you believe my statements without seeing me? But not God's.
Which gods statements? Do you mean Zeus , Odin , Woton , Shiva , Neptune do you not believe their statements as you’ve never seen them?
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: gods statements    logical skills   nbsp   Zeus  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
Not talking about God's that were defined by humans, talking about God who defines Himself, and he has been sending telegraphic messages from before 4000 years, but you are being deaf eared, blind eyed to those, but are aware of Gods that were define by humans, with human qualities like, progeny and death, but you believe they belong to category of gods. Is this a quality of someone with logical skills?
Its common sense anyone which consciousness and ability to communicate by anyway can define himself or herself. I can define myself and you can define yourself, by that logic God if there should be capable to define Himself.
There a simple method to disprove God. There are few question God asked in Quran that you just need to do it and viola you can disprove God easily
1. Are you a more difficult creation or is the Heaven [The visible universe for you] that He constructed?
Here you have to disprove by providing evidence that you are more difficult than the whole universe in your composition.
2. Were they created from nothing or did they create themselves?
Here you have to prove that you were created from nothing, and by nothing. which Atheist already do claim, so you just need to prove your claim.
3 A) This is the book/record in which there is no doubt,
3 B.) They say "He (Prophet) forged it (the Qur'an)." Say: "Bring you then ten forged surah (chapters) like unto it, and call whomsoever you can, other than Allah (to your help), if you speak the truth!"
Here it is claiming that the Quran is a certified record,
(a) and you just have to disprove that it is not. I hope you do know what certified record means. It should have 4 points :source of authority, Certification, preservation and contradiction.
(b) You have to prove your literary superiority against the Quran, and beat it in its Arabic (which might b difficult for you)
4. "Vision comprehends Him not, and He comprehends (all) vision; and He is the Knower or subtleties, the Aware."
This statement or similar is there in every previous monotheist religion scriptures.
a) "He cannot be seen, neither above, nor across, nor in the middle. He is beyond grasp. There is no image that is true to His from. His name is glory itself." The Svetasvatara Upanishad Chapter 4:19
b) "Neither the eye can behold Him nor the power of thinking can conceive Him" Dastir p 68.
"I can quote more but these are the oldest 4000 year old statements from three sources and should be enough as evidence"
So here, you just need to prove that your eyes are superior and have capability to see God, for that you just have to stare at midday sun without blinking or and aid for 5 minutes, to prove your superior eyes.
Gooduck disproving God.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
***/Not talking about God's that were defined by humans,
You mean like Allah .....Oooookay
****talking about God who defines Himself,
Prove it
***and he has been sending telegraphic messages from before 4000 years,
Prove it
****but you are being deaf eared, blind eyed to those, but are aware of Gods that were define by humans, with human qualities like, progeny and death, but you believe they belong to category of gods.
So you hear gods voices in your head ......you’re mentally unwell
****Is this a quality of someone with logical skills?
You mean like people who recieved “telegraphic messages from gods “?
That sort of logical?
****Its common sense anyone which consciousness and ability to communicate by anyway can define himself or herself. I can define myself and you can define yourself, by that logic God if there should be capable to define Himself.
Well tell Allah to show up and define himself ?
****There a simple method to disprove God. There are few question God asked in Quran that you just need to do it and viola you can disprove God easily
1. Are you a more difficult creation or is the Heaven [The visible universe for you] that He constructed?
Here you have to disprove by providing evidence that you are more difficult than the whole universe in your composition.
2. Were they created from nothing or did they create themselves?
Here you have to prove that you were created from nothing, and by nothing. which Atheist already do claim, so you just need to prove your claim.
3 A) This is the book/record in which there is no doubt,
3 B.) They say "He (Prophet) forged it (the Qur'an)." Say: "Bring you then ten forged surah (chapters) like unto it, and call whomsoever you can, other than Allah (to your help), if you speak the truth!"
Here it is claiming that the Quran is a certified record,
(a) and you just have to disprove that it is not. I hope you do know what certified record means. It should have 4 points :source of authority, Certification, preservation and contradiction.
(b) You have to prove your literary superiority against the Quran, and beat it in its Arabic (which might b difficult for you)
4. "Vision comprehends Him not, and He comprehends (all) vision; and He is the Knower or subtleties, the Aware."
This statement or similar is there in every previous monotheist religion scriptures.
a) "He cannot be seen, neither above, nor across, nor in the middle. He is beyond grasp. There is no image that is true to His from. His name is glory itself." The Svetasvatara Upanishad Chapter 4:19
b) "Neither the eye can behold Him nor the power of thinking can conceive Him" Dastir p 68.
"I can quote more but these are the oldest 4000 year old statements from three sources and should be enough as evidence"
So here, you just need to prove that your eyes are superior and have capability to see God, for that you just have to stare at midday sun without blinking or and aid for 5 minutes, to prove your superior eyes
Read on
****Gooduck disproving God
So prove your god , you cannot can you?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I can prove God, with just 2 claims
1. Quran is a certified record from God.
2. It has superior preservation compared to your human certified records.
There I proved God.
Because certified record is prove in of itself.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: superior preservation    human certified records.There   certified record   Quran  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are an atheist, you won't be one unless you can say you were created from nothing cosmologically ...and this is the burden of prove on all atheist...and you have done nothing to prove it yet.
So the burden of prove is still on you.
  Considerate: 41%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: burden of prove    atheist   burden    
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** I can prove God, with just 2 claims
1. Quran is a certified record from God.
It’s not it’s a book of contradictory
***/2. It has superior preservation compared to your human certified records.
I have no “human certified” records you clot , the Quran is still a book of
***There I proved God.
You didn’t , you proved you’re an
*****Because certified record is prove in of itself.
Certified by who you clown?
  Considerate: 27%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.82  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: certified record    human certified   superior preservation   book of contradictory BS  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Prove it
Prove it, your birth certificate, bank pass books, passport, ID cards, Bank cards, marriage certificates, property papers,,,,these all are certified records and are used as prove of your existence and your belongings, so prove me you don't have any. Or tear them and prove me that all property and money still belong to you.
You are an if you don't know how certified record works...this question proves that.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@kakalam777
***/Prove it
Muslims believe that Allah wrote the Qur'an, verbatim, and that Muhammad merely transcribed it.[1][2]
However, the entire first surah is a prayer to Allah.
Numerous other verses have similar issues.
As I said a book of B S
*****Prove it, your birth certificate, bank pass books, passport, ID cards, Bank cards, marriage certificates, property papers,,,,these all are certified records and are used as prove of your existence and your belongings, so prove me you don't have any.
Ha , Ha right tell the peado Allah to produce his birth certificate , passport and Visa card Bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha
****You are an if you don't know how certified record works...this question proves that.
Yet you cannot say who certified the Quran you peado
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Certified record is called such because it is from authoritative source...if it is not it wont be called as such.. And that is why it is considered as prove.
If you can't prove me that Quran is not a certified record then you proved nothing substantial.
So carry on.....the burden of prove is still on you.
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: burden of prove    oral recitation   authoritative source   Quran  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
****wait wrote why wrote? Quran is a oral recitation not a paper book.
Muslims believe that Allah wrote the Qur'an, verbatim, and that Muhammad merely transcribed
****Certified record is called such because it is from authoritative source..
A source you cannot prove
*****if it is not it wont be called as such..
Which is why it’s not except by the ignorant
****And that is why it is considered as prove.
Not by rational beings
****If you can't prove me that Quran is not a certified record then you proved nothing substantial.
So carry on.....the burden of prove is still on you.
Like the dummy you are you still don’t know what burden of proof means ......
Poor Osama still didn’t know what burden of proof is get an education son
  Considerate: 13%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.6  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: burden of prove    authoritative source   rational beings   certified record  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
@kakalam777 admits that he finds Islam offensive .....well done you have woken up
How is what’s written in your Hadiths offesnsive to you? Tale it up with Allah son
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.9  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Islam offensive    Tale   Hadiths   Allah son  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
You can't see how you are so ....you don't believe in Quran as a word of God from its written copies, but yet you believe in Aisha being married at 6 and being consummated at 9 from written source.
A source you cannot prove yourself.
Again the burden of prove is on you.
  Considerate: 16%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: word of God    Quran   copies   Aisha  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
So far you have 5 burden of prove. I can add more but don't think you are smart enough...I need prove for all this.
1. Universe came form nothing.
2. Quran is not a certified record,
3. You don't consider written certified record as prove and consider yourself "rational" yet you use your birth certificate and passport as prove for your existence and in future your prove of death will be a death certificate. again a written certified record.
4. You use written record about Prophet to accuse him as a "rational" being.
5. Prove your rationality.
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
@kakalam777 admits that he finds Islam offensive .....Kakalam admits the Quran is and admits he finds these Hadiths offensive but true
How is what’s written in your Hadiths offesnsive to you? Tale it up with Allah son
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Islam offensive    Hadiths offensive   Quran   Tale  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
*****So far I have 5 burden of prove. I can add more but don't think I am smart enough...I cannot prove any of this .
I know
****1. The Universe came form Allahs anus
O k
***/Quran is a pile of horse manure
I agree
***i don't consider written certified record as prove and consider myself "irrational" yet I use my certificate and passport as prove that I’m a peado
I know
***you have proved I’m an irrational
That’s true also
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 74%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 30%  
  Learn More About Debra
changing words won't change reality.
Produce your prove.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 67%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: words    prove      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
***I’m changing into women’s clothes at the moment
That does not surprise me in the least
****I feel a desire to make love to farm animals
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: women’s clothes    goats rumor   desire   love  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
prove it..
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 33%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
*** I've fallen in love with a neighbours goat , I'm taking after Muhammad he loved goats ....,My father married a goat so I guess it's in the genes
Hey thanks for sharing I guess it's all part of Islam at least you're not flying planes into buildings
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: neighbours goat    love   part of Islam   goats  
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Unfalsifiable ideas    @kakalam777   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra